IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2509.25721.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The AI Productivity Index (APEX)

Author

Listed:
  • Bertie Vidgen
  • Abby Fennelly
  • Evan Pinnix
  • Julien Benchek
  • Daniyal Khan
  • Zach Richards
  • Austin Bridges
  • Calix Huang
  • Ben Hunsberger
  • Isaac Robinson
  • Akul Datta
  • Chirag Mahapatra
  • Dominic Barton
  • Cass R. Sunstein
  • Eric Topol
  • Brendan Foody
  • Osvald Nitski

Abstract

We present an extended version of the AI Productivity Index (APEX-v1-extended), a benchmark for assessing whether frontier models are capable of performing economically valuable tasks in four jobs: investment banking associate, management consultant, big law associate, and primary care physician (MD). This technical report details the extensions to APEX-v1, including an increase in the held-out evaluation set from n = 50 to n = 100 cases per job (n = 400 total) and updates to the grading methodology. We present a new leaderboard, where GPT5 (Thinking = High) remains the top performing model with a score of 67.0%. APEX-v1-extended shows that frontier models still have substantial limitations when performing typical professional tasks. To support further research, we are open sourcing n = 25 non-benchmark example cases per role (n = 100 total) along with our evaluation harness.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertie Vidgen & Abby Fennelly & Evan Pinnix & Julien Benchek & Daniyal Khan & Zach Richards & Austin Bridges & Calix Huang & Ben Hunsberger & Isaac Robinson & Akul Datta & Chirag Mahapatra & Dominic B, 2025. "The AI Productivity Index (APEX)," Papers 2509.25721, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.25721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.25721
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.25721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.