IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2509.14080.html

Dynamic Inverse Optimization under Drift and Shocks: Theory, Regret Bounds, and Applications

Author

Listed:
  • JINHO CHA

    (Gwinnett Technical College)

Abstract

Operational decisions often reflect priorities that evolve gradually and may shift abruptly after disruptions. We develop a dynamic inverse optimization framework for recovering time-varying preference parameters from observed allocation trajectories. The framework separates an offline temporally regularized trajectory formulation from an online mirror-descent estimator for streaming recovery, thereby linking inverse optimization with online convex optimization under nonstationarity. We establish sufficient conditions for local identifiability and existence, static regret of $O(\sqrt{T})$, dynamic regret of $O(\sqrt{T}(1+V_T))$ for the online estimator, and a residual-to-parameter stability bound governed by the conditioning of the projected inverse map. The analysis distinguishes uniqueness of the inverse explanation, conditioning of the recovery map, existence of a batch trajectory solution, and sequential performance under a moving comparator. Controlled experiments on two stylized allocation benchmarks examine noiseless recoverability, finite-horizon regret, gradual drift, observational noise, abrupt shocks, and temporal coupling. These experiments are interpreted as finite-sample diagnostics rather than proofs of asymptotic bounds. Across the tested settings, temporal coupling moderates the trade-off between static under-adaptation and excessive variation from independent period-by-period inversion. The resulting framework provides an interpretable foundation for online inverse optimization and nonstationary decision analytics under evolving priorities. It also clarifies when structural recovery and sequential adaptation require distinct guarantees.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinho Cha, 2025. "Dynamic Inverse Optimization under Drift and Shocks: Theory, Regret Bounds, and Applications," Papers 2509.14080, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.14080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.14080
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Retsef Levi & Robin O. Roundy & David B. Shmoys, 2007. "Provably Near-Optimal Sampling-Based Policies for Stochastic Inventory Control Models," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 821-839, November.
    2. Timothy C. Y. Chan & Taewoo Lee & Daria Terekhov, 2019. "Inverse Optimization: Closed-Form Solutions, Geometry, and Goodness of Fit," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1115-1135, March.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    4. Ravindra K. Ahuja & James B. Orlin, 2001. "Inverse Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 771-783, October.
    5. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vivek F. Farias & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2011. "The Price of Fairness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-31, February.
    6. Zoé Fornier & Vincent Leclère & Pierre Pinson, 2025. "Fairness by design in shared-energy allocation problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1-40, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Kaw, Neal, 2020. "Inverse optimization for the recovery of constraint parameters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 415-427.
    2. Sheng Liu & Auyon Siddiq & Jingwei Zhang, 2025. "Planning Bike Lanes with Data: Ridership, Congestion, and Path Selection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7631-7654, September.
    3. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2010. "Robust Controls for Network Revenue Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 56-76, November.
    4. Qorbanian, Roozbeh & Löhndorf, Nils & Wozabal, David, 2025. "Valuation of power purchase agreements for corporate renewable energy procurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(3), pages 530-543.
    5. Chassein, André & Goerigk, Marc, 2018. "Variable-sized uncertainty and inverse problems in robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 17-28.
    6. Hyunwoo Lee & Seokhyun Chung & Taesu Cheong & Sang Hwa Song, 2018. "Accounting for Fairness in a Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model for Kidney Exchange Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Omar Besbes & Yuri Fonseca & Ilan Lobel, 2025. "Contextual Inverse Optimization: Offline and Online Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 424-443, January.
    8. Chen, Lu & Chen, Yuyi & Langevin, André, 2021. "An inverse optimization approach for a capacitated vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1087-1098.
    9. Bucarey, Víctor & Labbé, Martine & Morales, Juan M. & Pineda, Salvador, 2021. "An exact dynamic programming approach to segmented isotonic regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Roozbeh Qorbanian & Nils Lohndorf & David Wozabal, 2024. "Valuation of Power Purchase Agreements for Corporate Renewable Energy Procurement," Papers 2403.08846, arXiv.org.
    11. Rishabh Gupta & Qi Zhang, 2022. "Decomposition and Adaptive Sampling for Data-Driven Inverse Linear Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2720-2735, September.
    12. Carolin Bauerhenne & Rainer Kolisch & Andreas S. Schulz, 2026. "Robust Appointment Scheduling with Waiting Time Guarantees," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 995-1009, May.
    13. Carolin Bauerhenne & Rainer Kolisch & Andreas S. Schulz, 2024. "Robust Appointment Scheduling with Waiting Time Guarantees," Papers 2402.12561, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    14. Wei, Jinpeng & Xu, Xuanhua & Wang, Qiuhan & Wang, Zongrun & Guo, Weiwei & Javier Cabrerizo, Francisco, 2026. "A robust data-driven maximum experts consensus modeling approach considering fairness concerns under uncertain contexts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 333(3), pages 835-851.
    15. Michal Melamed & Aharon Ben-Tal & Boaz Golany, 2016. "On the average performance of the adjustable RO and its use as an offline tool for multi-period production planning under uncertainty," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 293-315, April.
    16. Yuanbo Li & Meiyan Lin & Houcai Shen & Lianmin Zhang, 2025. "Hedging against demand ambiguity in new product development: a two-stage distributionally robust approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(2), pages 1001-1035, May.
    17. Temitayo Ajayi & Taewoo Lee & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2022. "Objective Selection for Cancer Treatment: An Inverse Optimization Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1717-1738, May.
    18. Jonathan Yu-Meng Li, 2021. "Inverse Optimization of Convex Risk Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 7113-7141, November.
    19. Chung-Han Hsieh & Rong Gan, 2025. "Is Noisy Data a Blessing in Disguise? A Distributionally Robust Optimization Perspective," Papers 2509.01076, arXiv.org.
    20. Merve Bodur & Timothy C. Y. Chan & Ian Yihang Zhu, 2022. "Inverse Mixed Integer Optimization: Polyhedral Insights and Trust Region Methods," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1471-1488, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.14080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.