IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2508.18932.html

Are Higher Suspicious Transaction Report Volumes Associated with More Future Money-Laundering Convictions?

Author

Listed:
  • Rasmus Ingemann Tuffveson Jensen
  • Sebastian Holmby Hansen
  • Kalle Johannes Rose

Abstract

Almost all countries require banks to file suspicious transaction reports (STRs) to help authorities detect and prosecute money laundering. The number of STRs filed in a country is an often-cited metric in international anti-money laundering (AML) compliance evaluations. However, it remains unclear if the volume of STRs filed in a country is associated with the country's future number of money laundering convictions. Using data from Europol, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics, we examine if STR volumes can be associated with future money-laundering conviction volumes in countries in the European Union. Our analysis employs pooled and fixed-effects regression models with one- to five-year lags, controlling for population sizes, shadow-economy estimates, and police force sizes. In our pooled and country-specific fixed-effects models, STR volumes appear to be positively associated with future convictions. However, the association weakens and becomes insignificant when we control for both country-specific and common time effects. Our results provide a caution against assuming that STR volumes, by themselves, are reliable indicators of future money-laundering convictions and, to the extent convictions reflect outcomes, AML effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasmus Ingemann Tuffveson Jensen & Sebastian Holmby Hansen & Kalle Johannes Rose, 2025. "Are Higher Suspicious Transaction Report Volumes Associated with More Future Money-Laundering Convictions?," Papers 2508.18932, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2508.18932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.18932
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2508.18932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.