IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2507.08584.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

To Trade or Not to Trade: An Agentic Approach to Estimating Market Risk Improves Trading Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitrios Emmanoulopoulos
  • Ollie Olby
  • Justin Lyon
  • Namid R. Stillman

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in agentic frameworks, in which prompts trigger complex tool-based analysis in pursuit of a goal. While these frameworks have shown promise across multiple domains including in finance, they typically lack a principled model-building step, relying instead on sentiment- or trend-based analysis. We address this gap by developing an agentic system that uses LLMs to iteratively discover stochastic differential equations for financial time series. These models generate risk metrics which inform daily trading decisions. We evaluate our system in both traditional backtests and using a market simulator, which introduces synthetic but causally plausible price paths and news events. We find that model-informed trading strategies outperform standard LLM-based agents, improving Sharpe ratios across multiple equities. Our results show that combining LLMs with agentic model discovery enhances market risk estimation and enables more profitable trading decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitrios Emmanoulopoulos & Ollie Olby & Justin Lyon & Namid R. Stillman, 2025. "To Trade or Not to Trade: An Agentic Approach to Estimating Market Risk Improves Trading Decisions," Papers 2507.08584, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.08584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.08584
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.08584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.