IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2506.08026.html

TIP-Search: Time-Predictable Inference Scheduling for Market Prediction under Uncertain Load

Author

Listed:
  • Xibai Wang

Abstract

Real-time market prediction services need correct predictions before a decision deadline; a correct prediction delivered late is not usable. TIP-Search studies time-predictable inference scheduling over fixed market predictors under uncertain load. It filters conformal latency-quantile feasible models, dispatches over finite workers, and uses shielded constrained online experts to trade accuracy, queue pressure, and deadline risk. On the optimized deployable pool, TIP-Search reaches 0.994 raw accuracy and 0.991 timely accuracy. On official TLOB FI-2010 h=10, TIP-Search++ raises timely accuracy from 0.156 to 0.239 and deadline satisfaction from 0.391 to 0.962. In matched h10 profiled systems replay, OCO-ACPO reaches 0.303 timely accuracy and 0.951 deadline satisfaction, with paired gains over RAMSIS/SneakPeek/utility-style comparators of $+0.00285$ timely accuracy ($p=0.0118$) and $+0.0146$ deadline satisfaction ($p=1.5{\times}10^{-5}$). SA-OCO-ACPO improves timely/deadline service by 0.188--0.417 over CPO under nonstationary stress. The claim is a systems scheduling result, not a broad LOB classifier leaderboard.

Suggested Citation

  • Xibai Wang, 2025. "TIP-Search: Time-Predictable Inference Scheduling for Market Prediction under Uncertain Load," Papers 2506.08026, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2506.08026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.08026
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin Sirignano & Rama Cont, 2019. "Universal features of price formation in financial markets: perspectives from deep learning," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1449-1459, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Briola & Jeremy Turiel & Riccardo Marcaccioli & Alvaro Cauderan & Tomaso Aste, 2021. "Deep Reinforcement Learning for Active High Frequency Trading," Papers 2101.07107, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    2. Michael Giegrich & Roel Oomen & Christoph Reisinger, 2024. "Limit Order Book Simulation and Trade Evaluation with $K$-Nearest-Neighbor Resampling," Papers 2409.06514, arXiv.org.
    3. Eghbal Rahimikia & Stefan Zohren & Ser-Huang Poon, 2021. "Realised Volatility Forecasting: Machine Learning via Financial Word Embedding," Papers 2108.00480, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    4. Anindya Goswami & Nimit Rana, 2024. "A market resilient data-driven approach to option pricing," Papers 2409.08205, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    5. Nosratabadi, Saeed & Mosavi, Amir & Duan, Puhong & Ghamisi, Pedram & Filip, Ferdinand & Band, Shahab S. & Reuter, Uwe & Gama, Joao & Gandomi, Amir H., 2020. "Data science in economics: comprehensive review of advanced machine learning and deep learning methods," FrenXiv e75gc_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. repec:osf:thesis:auyvc_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Zijian Shi & John Cartlidge, 2024. "Neural stochastic agent‐based limit order book simulation with neural point process and diffusion probabilistic model," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), June.
    8. Xu, Hailun & Yuan, Xianghui & Jin, Liwei & Long, Jun & Xu, Gen, 2026. "Ascertaining price formation in financial markets with machine learning: Evidence from Chinese stocks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Hong Guo & Jianwu Lin & Fanlin Huang, 2023. "Market Making with Deep Reinforcement Learning from Limit Order Books," Papers 2305.15821, arXiv.org.
    10. Sebastian Jaimungal, 2022. "Reinforcement learning and stochastic optimisation," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 103-129, January.
    11. Mathieu Rosenbaum & Jianfei Zhang, 2022. "On the universality of the volatility formation process: when machine learning and rough volatility agree," Papers 2206.14114, arXiv.org.
    12. Weronika Ormaniec & Marcin Pitera & Sajad Safarveisi & Thorsten Schmidt, 2022. "Estimating value at risk: LSTM vs. GARCH," Papers 2207.10539, arXiv.org.
    13. Johann Lussange & Stefano Vrizzi & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Stefano Palminteri & Boris Gutkin, 2023. "Stock Price Formation: Precepts from a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Model," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(4), pages 1523-1544, April.
    14. Wang, Yijun & Andreeva, Galina & Martin-Barragan, Belen, 2023. "Machine learning approaches to forecasting cryptocurrency volatility: Considering internal and external determinants," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Longbing Cao, 2021. "AI in Finance: Challenges, Techniques and Opportunities," Papers 2107.09051, arXiv.org.
    16. repec:osf:metaar:haf2v_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Yufei Wu & Mahmoud Mahfouz & Daniele Magazzeni & Manuela Veloso, 2021. "How Robust are Limit Order Book Representations under Data Perturbation?," Papers 2110.04752, arXiv.org.
    18. Johann Lussange & Ivan Lazarevich & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Stefano Palminteri & Boris Gutkin, 2021. "Modelling Stock Markets by Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(1), pages 113-147, January.
    19. Nazemi, Abdolreza & Rezazadeh, Hani & Fabozzi, Frank J. & Höchstötter, Markus, 2022. "Deep learning for modeling the collection rate for third-party buyers," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 240-252.
    20. Nolan Alexander & William Scherer, 2024. "Using Machine Learning to Forecast Market Direction with Efficient Frontier Coefficients," Papers 2404.00825, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    21. Xianfei Hui & Baiqing Sun & Hui Jiang & Indranil SenGupta, 2021. "Analysis of stock index with a generalized BN-S model: an approach based on machine learning and fuzzy parameters," Papers 2101.08984, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    22. Lucchese, Lorenzo & Pakkanen, Mikko S. & Veraart, Almut E.D., 2024. "The short-term predictability of returns in order book markets: A deep learning perspective," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 1587-1621.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2506.08026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.