IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2312.13896.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative Evaluation of Anomaly Detection Methods for Fraud Detection in Online Credit Card Payments

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Thimonier
  • Fabrice Popineau
  • Arpad Rimmel
  • Bich-Li^en Doan
  • Fabrice Daniel

Abstract

This study explores the application of anomaly detection (AD) methods in imbalanced learning tasks, focusing on fraud detection using real online credit card payment data. We assess the performance of several recent AD methods and compare their effectiveness against standard supervised learning methods. Offering evidence of distribution shift within our dataset, we analyze its impact on the tested models' performances. Our findings reveal that LightGBM exhibits significantly superior performance across all evaluated metrics but suffers more from distribution shifts than AD methods. Furthermore, our investigation reveals that LightGBM also captures the majority of frauds detected by AD methods. This observation challenges the potential benefits of ensemble methods to combine supervised, and AD approaches to enhance performance. In summary, this research provides practical insights into the utility of these techniques in real-world scenarios, showing LightGBM's superiority in fraud detection while highlighting challenges related to distribution shifts.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Thimonier & Fabrice Popineau & Arpad Rimmel & Bich-Li^en Doan & Fabrice Daniel, 2023. "Comparative Evaluation of Anomaly Detection Methods for Fraud Detection in Online Credit Card Payments," Papers 2312.13896, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2312.13896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.13896
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2312.13896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.