IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2311.12575.html

Dimension-Reduced Cosine Expansions via Tensor Decomposition: Methodology and Applications to Credit Exposure Quantification

Author

Listed:
  • Gijs Mast
  • Fang Fang
  • Xiaoyu Shen
  • Marnix Brands

Abstract

This paper initiates a series of studies on a COS-tensor framework, as an efficient alternative to MC for large and liquid portfolios characterized by a modest number of dominant risk factors but a large number of trades. The framework is built on three key insights. First, the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of portfolio level mark-to-market (MtM) values and exposures can be recovered in the Fourier domain by first numerically evaluating their characteristic functions and subsequently applying the one-dimensional COS method. Second, the curse of dimensionality arising in the evaluation of netting-set characteristic functions is mitigated by dimension-reduced cosine expansions derived by combining Fourier-cosine series representations with tensor decomposition techniques. This reformulation shifts the main computational burden from online evaluation to an offline training stage. Third, the offline training can be performed directly in the Fourier domain by reapplying the core idea of the COS method. This improves both training speed and accuracy by more than two orders of magnitude compared with gradient-based training in the physical domain. This paper establishes the core methodology of dimension-reduced cosine expansions, together with the efficient training algorithm, and applies it to netting-set-level MtM and exposure calculations. Among several tensor decomposition techniques, we focus on Canonical Polyadic Decomposition (CPD) for CCR quantification due to its simplicity and transparency, which are particularly appealing in practical risk-management applications. Numerical experiments on netting sets comprising tens of thousands of trades driven by seven risk factors demonstrate that the proposed method achieves relative errors below 0.1% while requiring only a small fraction of the runtime of MC simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gijs Mast & Fang Fang & Xiaoyu Shen & Marnix Brands, 2023. "Dimension-Reduced Cosine Expansions via Tensor Decomposition: Methodology and Applications to Credit Exposure Quantification," Papers 2311.12575, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.12575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.12575
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junike, Gero & Pankrashkin, Konstantin, 2022. "Precise option pricing by the COS method—How to choose the truncation range," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 421(C).
    2. Lin, X. Sheldon & Yang, Shuai, 2020. "Fast and efficient nested simulation for large variable annuity portfolios: A surrogate modeling approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 85-103.
    3. Li, Shuang & Peng, Cheng & Bao, Ying & Zhao, Yanlong, 2020. "Explicit expressions to counterparty credit exposures for Forward and European Option," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    4. Gero Junike & Konstantin Pankrashkin, 2021. "Precise option pricing by the COS method--How to choose the truncation range," Papers 2109.01030, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    5. Kathrin Glau & Ricardo Pachon & Christian Pötz, 2021. "Speed-up credit exposure calculations for pricing and risk management," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 481-499, March.
    6. Feng, Runhuan & Li, Peng, 2022. "Sample recycling method – a new approach to efficient nested Monte Carlo simulations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 336-359.
    7. Patrik Karlsson & Shashi Jain & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2016. "Counterparty Credit Exposures for Interest Rate Derivatives using the Stochastic Grid Bundling Method," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 175-196, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Domagoj Demeterfi & Kathrin Glau & Linus Wunderlich, 2025. "Function approximations for counterparty credit exposure calculations," Papers 2507.09004, arXiv.org.
    2. Tobias Behrens & Gero Junike & Wim Schoutens, 2023. "Failure of Fourier pricing techniques to approximate the Greeks," Papers 2306.08421, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    3. Gero Junike & Hauke Stier, 2024. "Enhancing Fourier pricing with machine learning," Papers 2412.05070, arXiv.org.
    4. Gaetano Agazzotti & Jean-Philippe Aguilar, 2025. "Fast and explicit European option pricing under tempered stable processes," Papers 2510.01211, arXiv.org.
    5. Michael Samet & Christian Bayer & Chiheb Ben Hammouda & Antonis Papapantoleon & Ra'ul Tempone, 2022. "Optimal Damping with Hierarchical Adaptive Quadrature for Efficient Fourier Pricing of Multi-Asset Options in L\'evy Models," Papers 2203.08196, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    6. Dang, Ou & Feng, Mingbin & Hardy, Mary R., 2023. "Two-stage nested simulation of tail risk measurement: A likelihood ratio approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-24.
    7. Shi, Ruoshi & Zhao, Yanlong & Bao, Ying & Peng, Cheng, 2022. "Sensitivity-based Conditional Value at Risk (SCVaR): An efficient measurement of credit exposure for options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    8. Carole Bernard & Gero Junike & Thibaut Lux & Steven Vanduffel, 2024. "Cost-efficient payoffs under model ambiguity," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 965-997, October.
    9. Gero Junike & Hauke Stier, 2023. "From characteristic functions to multivariate distribution functions and European option prices by the damped COS method," Papers 2307.12843, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    10. Gero Junike, 2023. "On the number of terms in the COS method for European option pricing," Papers 2303.16012, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    11. T. van der Zwaard & L. A. Grzelak & C. W. Oosterlee, 2024. "On the Hull-White model with volatility smile for Valuation Adjustments," Papers 2403.14841, arXiv.org.
    12. Brignone, Riccardo & Gonzato, Luca, 2024. "Exact simulation of the Hull and White stochastic volatility model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Junike, Gero, 2025. "Precise quantile function estimation from the characteristic function," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. Xiaoyu Shen & Fang Fang & Chengguang Liu, 2024. "The Fourier Cosine Method for Discrete Probability Distributions," Papers 2410.04487, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    15. A. Aimi & C. Guardasoni & L. Ortiz-Gracia & S. Sanfelici, 2023. "Fast Barrier Option Pricing by the COS BEM Method in Heston Model," Papers 2301.00648, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    16. Zhang, Zhimin & Zhong, Wei, 2024. "Efficient valuation of guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits in regime switching jump diffusion models with lapse risk," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    17. Kathrin Glau & Ricardo Pachon & Christian Potz, 2019. "Speed-up credit exposure calculations for pricing and risk management," Papers 1912.01280, arXiv.org.
    18. Alessandro Gnoatto & Athena Picarelli & Christoph Reisinger, 2020. "Deep xVA solver -- A neural network based counterparty credit risk management framework," Papers 2005.02633, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    19. Areski Cousin & Ying Jiao & Christian Yann Robert & Olivier David Zerbib, 2022. "Optimal Asset Allocation Subject to Withdrawal Risk and Solvency Constraints," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-28, January.
    20. Lim, Hong Beng & Shyamalkumar, Nariankadu D. & Tao, Siyang, 2025. "Valuation of variable annuity portfolios using finite and infinite width neural networks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 269-284.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.12575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.