IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2301.12719.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Validation of machine learning based scenario generators

Author

Listed:
  • Solveig Flaig
  • Gero Junike

Abstract

Machine learning methods are getting more and more important in the development of internal models using scenario generation. As internal models under Solvency 2 have to be validated, an important question is in which aspects the validation of these data-driven models differs from a classical theory-based model. On the specific example of market risk, we discuss the necessity of two additional validation tasks: one to check the dependencies between the risk factors used and one to detect the unwanted memorizing effect. The first one is necessary because in this new method, the dependencies are not derived from a financial-mathematical theory. The latter one arises when the machine learning model only repeats empirical data instead of generating new scenarios. These measures are then applied for an machine learning based economic scenario generator. It is shown that those measures lead to reasonable results in this context and are able to be used for validation as well as for model optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Solveig Flaig & Gero Junike, 2023. "Validation of machine learning based scenario generators," Papers 2301.12719, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2301.12719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.12719
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magnus Wiese & Lianjun Bai & Ben Wood & Hans Buehler, 2019. "Deep Hedging: Learning to Simulate Equity Option Markets," Papers 1911.01700, arXiv.org.
    2. Solveig Flaig & Gero Junike, 2021. "Scenario generation for market risk models using generative neural networks," Papers 2109.10072, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    3. Mondal, Pronoy K. & Biswas, Munmun & Ghosh, Anil K., 2015. "On high dimensional two-sample tests based on nearest neighbors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 168-178.
    4. Solveig Flaig & Gero Junike, 2022. "Scenario Generation for Market Risk Models Using Generative Neural Networks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Dietmar Pfeifer & Olena Ragulina, 2018. "Generating VaR Scenarios under Solvency II with Product Beta Distributions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Magnus Wiese & Robert Knobloch & Ralf Korn & Peter Kretschmer, 2020. "Quant GANs: deep generation of financial time series," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1419-1440, September.
    7. Ebner, Bruno & Henze, Norbert & Yukich, Joseph E., 2018. "Multivariate goodness-of-fit on flat and curved spaces via nearest neighbor distances," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 231-242.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Szymon Kubiak & Tillman Weyde & Oleksandr Galkin & Dan Philps & Ram Gopal, 2023. "Improved Data Generation for Enhanced Asset Allocation: A Synthetic Dataset Approach for the Fixed Income Universe," Papers 2311.16004, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solveig Flaig & Gero Junike, 2021. "Scenario generation for market risk models using generative neural networks," Papers 2109.10072, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    2. Solveig Flaig & Gero Junike, 2022. "Scenario Generation for Market Risk Models Using Generative Neural Networks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Michael Karpe, 2020. "An overall view of key problems in algorithmic trading and recent progress," Papers 2006.05515, arXiv.org.
    4. Blanka Horvath & Josef Teichmann & Žan Žurič, 2021. "Deep Hedging under Rough Volatility," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Blanka Horvath & Josef Teichmann & Zan Zuric, 2021. "Deep Hedging under Rough Volatility," Papers 2102.01962, arXiv.org.
    6. Weilong Fu & Ali Hirsa & Jorg Osterrieder, 2022. "Simulating financial time series using attention," Papers 2207.00493, arXiv.org.
    7. Gero Junike & Hauke Stier & Marcus C. Christiansen, 2022. "Sequential decompositions at their limit," Papers 2212.06733, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    8. Haoyang Cao & Xin Guo, 2021. "Generative Adversarial Network: Some Analytical Perspectives," Papers 2104.12210, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    9. Magnus Wiese & Phillip Murray, 2022. "Risk-Neutral Market Simulation," Papers 2202.13996, arXiv.org.
    10. Aya-Moreno, Carlos & Geenens, Gery & Penev, Spiridon, 2018. "Shape-preserving wavelet-based multivariate density estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 30-47.
    11. Szymon Kubiak & Tillman Weyde & Oleksandr Galkin & Dan Philps & Ram Gopal, 2023. "Improved Data Generation for Enhanced Asset Allocation: A Synthetic Dataset Approach for the Fixed Income Universe," Papers 2311.16004, arXiv.org.
    12. Vedant Choudhary & Sebastian Jaimungal & Maxime Bergeron, 2023. "FuNVol: A Multi-Asset Implied Volatility Market Simulator using Functional Principal Components and Neural SDEs," Papers 2303.00859, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    13. Alexandre Miot, 2020. "Adversarial trading," Papers 2101.03128, arXiv.org.
    14. Myladis R. Cogollo & Gilberto González-Parra & Abraham J. Arenas, 2021. "Modeling and Forecasting Cases of RSV Using Artificial Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Hans Buhler & Blanka Horvath & Terry Lyons & Imanol Perez Arribas & Ben Wood, 2020. "A Data-driven Market Simulator for Small Data Environments," Papers 2006.14498, arXiv.org.
    16. Edmond Lezmi & Jules Roche & Thierry Roncalli & Jiali Xu, 2020. "Improving the Robustness of Trading Strategy Backtesting with Boltzmann Machines and Generative Adversarial Networks," Papers 2007.04838, arXiv.org.
    17. Dietmar Pfeifer & Olena Ragulina, 2020. "Adaptive Bernstein Copulas and Risk Management," Papers 2011.00909, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    18. Yufei Wu & Mahmoud Mahfouz & Daniele Magazzeni & Manuela Veloso, 2021. "How Robust are Limit Order Book Representations under Data Perturbation?," Papers 2110.04752, arXiv.org.
    19. Dietmar Pfeifer & Olena Ragulina, 2020. "Adaptive Bernstein Copulas and Risk Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Arthur Pewsey & Eduardo García-Portugués, 2021. "Recent advances in directional statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 1-58, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2301.12719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.