IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2008.03355.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Obamacare and a Fix for the IRS Iteration

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel J. Ferguson

Abstract

We model the quantities appearing in Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax guidance for calculating the health insurance premium tax credit created by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also called Obamacare. We ask the question of whether there is a procedure, computable by hand, which can calculate the appropriate premium tax credit for any household with self-employment income. We motivate current IRS tax guidance, which has had self-employed taxpayers use a fixed point iteration to calculate their premium tax credits since 2014. Then, we give an example showing that the IRS iteration can lead to a divergent sequence of iterates. As a consequence, IRS guidance does not calculate appropriate premium tax credits for tax returns in certain income intervals, adversely affecting eligible beneficiaries. A bisection procedure for calculating premium tax credits is proposed. We prove that this procedure calculates appropriate premium tax credits for a model of simple tax returns. This is generalized to the case where premium tax credits are received in advance, which is the most common one in applications. We outline the problem of calculating appropriate premium tax credits for models of general tax returns. While the bisection procedure will work with the tax code in its current configuration, it could fail, eg, in states which have not expanded Medicaid, if a new deduction with certain properties were to arise.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel J. Ferguson, 2020. "Obamacare and a Fix for the IRS Iteration," Papers 2008.03355, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2008.03355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.03355
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2008.03355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.