IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1809.08293.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The "power" dimension in a process of exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Banterle

Abstract

The field of study of this paper is the analysis of the exchange between two subjects. Circumscribed to the micro dimension, it is however expanded with respect to standard economic theory by introducing both the dimension of power and the motivation to exchange. The basic reference is made by the reflections of those economists, preeminently John Kenneth Galbraith, who criticize the removal from the neoclassical economy of the "power" dimension. We have also referred to the criticism that Galbraith, among others, makes to the assumption of neoclassical economists that the "motivation" in exchanges is solely linked to the reward, to the money obtained in the exchange. We have got around the problem of having a large number of types of power and also a large number of forms of motivation by directly taking into account the effects on the welfare of each subject, regardless of the means with which they are achieved: that is, referring to everything that happens in the negotiation process to the potential or real variations of the welfare function induced in each subject due to the exercise of the specific form of power, on a case by case basis, and of the intensity of the motivation to perform the exchange. In the construction of a mathematical model we paid great attention to its usability in field testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Banterle, 2018. "The "power" dimension in a process of exchange," Papers 1809.08293, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2019.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1809.08293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.08293
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1809.08293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.