IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1706.00948.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial Series Prediction: Comparison Between Precision of Time Series Models and Machine Learning Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Xin-Yao Qian

Abstract

Precise financial series predicting has long been a difficult problem because of unstableness and many noises within the series. Although Traditional time series models like ARIMA and GARCH have been researched and proved to be effective in predicting, their performances are still far from satisfying. Machine Learning, as an emerging research field in recent years, has brought about many incredible improvements in tasks such as regressing and classifying, and it's also promising to exploit the methodology in financial time series predicting. In this paper, the predicting precision of financial time series between traditional time series models and mainstream machine learning models including some state-of-the-art ones of deep learning are compared through experiment using real stock index data from history. The result shows that machine learning as a modern method far surpasses traditional models in precision.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin-Yao Qian, 2017. "Financial Series Prediction: Comparison Between Precision of Time Series Models and Machine Learning Methods," Papers 1706.00948, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1706.00948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.00948
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1706.00948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.