IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1602.02011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Issues with the Smith-Wilson method

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Lager{aa}s
  • Mathias Lindholm

Abstract

The objective of the present paper is to analyse various features of the Smith-Wilson method used for discounting under the EU regulation Solvency II, with special attention to hedging. In particular, we show that all key rate duration hedges of liabilities beyond the Last Liquid Point will be peculiar. Moreover, we show that there is a connection between the occurrence of negative discount factors and singularities in the convergence criterion used to calibrate the model. The main tool used for analysing hedges is a novel stochastic representation of the Smith-Wilson method. Further, we provide necessary conditions needed in order to construct similar, but hedgeable, discount curves.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Lager{aa}s & Mathias Lindholm, 2016. "Issues with the Smith-Wilson method," Papers 1602.02011, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1602.02011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.02011
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jørgensen, Peter Løchte, 2018. "An analysis of the Solvency II regulatory framework’s Smith-Wilson model for the term structure of risk-free interest rates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 219-237.
    2. Lutz Kruschwitz, 2018. "Das Problem der Anschlussverzinsung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 9-45, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1602.02011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.