IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aoh/conpro/2024i5p307-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Advantages of Long-Term Investing in Open Investment Funds Versus Bank Deposits in Emerging Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Besfort Imeri

    (Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics - Skopje)

Abstract

Purpose The capital market, in every country, as well as in the Republic of North Macedonia, has an impact on economic growth and development. Citizens are the main pillar of saving and investing in all fields of economy and finance. Open investment funds in our country, although young, act as direct intermediaries and participants in the capital market (Arsova, 2021). However taking into account that the participation of citizens' investment in open investment funds is relatively low, compared with the more developed countries of Western Europe (Usmanovich, 2018), they are also low compared to investing in bank deposits (Cvetkoski, 2014). Whether our profits differ very much from our choice of investment between open investment funds and banking deposit, and whether should we consider it before investing in long-term investment (Halland et al., 2016). Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from the financial market in North Macedonia, especially from the Central Bank annual reports from the last 10 years (NBRM, 2023). The method of regression analysis is used to determine whether and how much investment from our choice affects those returns between two options of investments in bank deposit or open investment funds. Also, through the scatter diagrams and regression lines we are going to determine if the relation is directly positive or inverse, with the increase in spending on investment in the bank and the investment fund, in cases with increasing the investment deadline. Also, the coefficients of determination will be additionally calculated (Ristevski and Tevdoski, 2016). Findings Although we know that by nature these 2 parameters (investment and returns) are in positive proportion, it has been scientifically analyzed that in long-term there is a direct-positive functional straight-line relationship between these 2 parameters, but also through the scatter diagram and the regression line, our study in this paper showed that given the amount of investment in a bank and an investment fund, the difference in yield is large and grows with increasing investment and the term. Because the final result of the equation seems to be directly positive, additionally we have calculated the coefficient of determination, to finally confirm the significant regression relationship. Practical implementation – This study shows that in emerging economies like North Macedonia, it is very important to analyze and make it known to different investors that there are other opportunities for investment, respectively redirecting their free funds to other investment channels, such as Investment Funds, which bring significantly higher returns, in comparison with bank deposits Originality/value The originality of my paper lies in the direct analysis and examination of data reports given annually by the National Bank of North Macedonia for the past 10 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Besfort Imeri, 2024. "The Advantages of Long-Term Investing in Open Investment Funds Versus Bank Deposits in Emerging Economies," Proceedings of the 5th International Conference "Economic and Business Trends Shaping the Future" 2024 032, Faculty of Economics-Skopje, Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoh:conpro:2024:i:5:p:307-309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.ukim.mk/bitstream/20.500.12188/31978/1/00032%20The%20Advantages%20of%20Long-Term%20Investing%20in%20Open%20Investment%20Funds%20versus%20Bank%20Deposits%20in%20Emerging%20Economies.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Capital Market; Investment Fund; Banking Sector; Investment; Yield; Straight Line Regression; Financial Market;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoh:conpro:2024:i:5:p:307-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nikolina Palamidovska-Sterjadovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efukimk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.