IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ant/wpaper/2020001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Replacing SF6 in electrical gas-insulated switchgear: technological alternatives and potential life cycle greenhouse gas savings in an EU-28 perspective

Author

Listed:
  • BILLEN, Pieter
  • MAES, Ben
  • LARRAÍN, Macarena
  • BRAET, Johan

Abstract

To date, global atmospheric concentrations of F-gases with alleged high global warming potential are still on the rise. The most potent among the greenhouse gases identified as such by IPCC is sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), which has been used in various applications because of its chemical stability and inertness, next to its high dielectric strength. In the European Union, its use has to date been banned from several applications, for which technological alternatives exist. An important exception is gas-insulated electrical switchgear (GIS), both for medium voltage and high voltage applications, to which cost-effective and environmentally sound alternatives were unavailable when the F-gas regulation was last revised in 2014. Yet, to date, interest in technological alternatives has grown, and we argue that a next step in the phasing out of SF6 may spur the accelerated development of alternatives with lower carbon footprint. The installed SF6 amount in switchgear in the EU-28 is unclear, estimated between 10 800 and 24 700 t (with a mode at 12 700 t) in 2017, resulting in 68 to 140 t of annual emissions from operational leakage only, corresponding to 1.6 to 3.3 Mt of CO2-eq. The higher emissions value seems more likely, as its underlying model (EDGAR) was earlier corroborated by measurements. In our study, we estimate the potential greenhouse gas savings over the lifecycle of one exemplary 145 kV gas-insulated switchgear bay upon replacing SF6 by decafluoro-2-methylbutan-3-one (C5-FK) and heptafluoro-2-methylpropanenitrile (C4-FN) mixtures. These single-bay results were projected over estimated future installed high-voltage GIS in the EU-28 consequentially. A phase-out scenario starting from 2020 onwards could reduce the carbon footprint by 4 to 31 Mt, with median at 14 Mt, of CO2-eq., over a period of 50 years. A phase-out starting in 2025, allowing more time for further technology development, results in 12.5 Mt of CO2-eq. (median) savings by 2070. Extrapolation to medium voltage is uncertain, given the decentralization of electricity distribution, yet one can assume savings of similar magnitude.

Suggested Citation

  • BILLEN, Pieter & MAES, Ben & LARRAÍN, Macarena & BRAET, Johan, 2020. "Replacing SF6 in electrical gas-insulated switchgear: technological alternatives and potential life cycle greenhouse gas savings in an EU-28 perspective," Working Papers 2020001, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2020001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/4b9b30/165428.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Owens & Ang Xiao & Jason Bonk & Michael DeLorme & Agnes Zhang, 2021. "Recent Development of Two Alternative Gases to SF 6 for High Voltage Electrical Power Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2020001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joeri Nys (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ftufsbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.