IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ant/wpaper/2010010.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Live subtitling with speech recognition causes and consequences of text reduction

Author

Listed:
  • LUYCKX, Bieke
  • DELBEKE, Tijs
  • VAN WAES, Luuk
  • LEIJTEN, Mariëlle
  • REMAEL, Aline

Abstract

Speech technology has made it possible to use speech recognition for simultaneous subtitling of live television broadcasts via the technique of respeaking. Despite the considerable prior research into the quality of live subtitling using speech recognition, little research has focused on the quantitative aspects of subtitles. Although live subtitles are nearly always a reduced form of the spoken comments, the exact causes of text reduction are still largely unidentified. This study aims at a better understanding of the causes and consequences of text reduction in a live subtitling context. Three excerpts of an infotainment talk show were subtitled by twelve respeakers of the Flemish public television. They were instructed to do this in three different reduction conditions. Various subtitle features, such as reduction percentages and delay, as well as measures of the respeakers’ working memory were collected. Both a quantitative and qualitative analysis were carried out. In the quantitative analysis we opted for a multilevel analysis to take into account the hierarchical nature of the data. In the qualitative analysis, we discussed the effects of commonly used reduction strategies. The results show that reduction is not a random process. In contrast, it is largely determined by a number of external factors, viz. delay, amount of source text and the proportion of ‘full’ reductions. There is a large amount of evidence suggesting that respeakers prefer to omit certain comments rather than reducing them to a certain extent. It also appears that the decision to fully omit a comment seems not to be primarily based on the amount of input, while the decision to partially reduce is. Differences in the capacity of the working memory do not seem to affect text reduction as such. Finally, the qualitative analysis demonstrated that respeakers use a wide variety of strategies to reduce the spoken comments in order to limit the loss of information as much as possible.

Suggested Citation

  • LUYCKX, Bieke & DELBEKE, Tijs & VAN WAES, Luuk & LEIJTEN, Mariëlle & REMAEL, Aline, 2010. "Live subtitling with speech recognition causes and consequences of text reduction," Working Papers 2010010, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2010010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/7418cf/963a308c.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2010010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joeri Nys (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ftufsbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.