IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Style breaks in return-based style analysis


  • ANNAERT, Jan


Despite the wide acceptance of return-based style analysis, the method has several limitations. One important drawback is the underlying assumption that the style exposures do not vary over time. In general, little attention was devoted to examining whether this hypothesis is acceptable, although a number of studies have documented that time variation in style exposure does occur. We apply results on break tests established in Andrews and Ploberger (1994), Hansen (1997) and Bai and Perron (1998, 2001) to examine profoundly the possibility of style breaks. We find strong evidence against the hypothesis of constant time exposures in time in daily return data of European equity funds. All funds exhibit at least one break, while 60% of the funds exhibit even more than one break. The style breaks may be induced by economic motives or may be related to other factors such as changes in management structure. A comparison of the number of breaks in the standard style analysis and an extended model where one additional variable capturing an economic motive is added, reveals that the most promising pursuit for explaining (the majority of) style breaks is to be found in economic motives.

Suggested Citation

  • ANNAERT, Jan & VAN CAMPENHOUT, Geert, 2002. "Style breaks in return-based style analysis," Working Papers 2002019, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2002019

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Cassimon, D. & Engelen, P. J. & Thomassen, L. & Van Wouwe, M., 2004. "The valuation of a NDA using a 6-fold compound option," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 41-51, January.
    2. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    3. Geske, Robert, 1979. "The valuation of compound options," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 63-81, March.
    4. THOMASSEN, Liesbeth & VAN WOUWE, Martine, "undated". "The n-fold compound option," Working Papers 2001041, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2002019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joeri Nys). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.