IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/amz/wpaper/2026-28.html

State Child Tax Credits and Parental Labor Supply: Evidence from Staggered Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • White, Justin

    (Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University)

  • Xu, Ziyue

    (Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University)

  • Hamad, Rita

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

  • Parolin, Zachary

    (The Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford)

Abstract

States increasingly supplement the federal Child Tax Credit (CTC) with credits that vary in generosity, refundability, and earnings requirements. We examine changes in parental employment, labor force participation, and work hours following state CTC adoption using the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS-ASEC), 2004–2026. Our preferred stacked difference-in-differences design includes 12 adopting states with complete event-time support and compares them with never-treated states and states that adopted after our evaluation window. Averaging over the first three post-adoption survey years, the estimated effect is 0.05 percentage points (SE 1.03) for employment and −0.46 points (0.82) for labor force participation; estimates for work hours are also close to zero. Across secondary specifications and CPS Basic Monthly analyses, extensive-margin estimates were similarly small. Larger simulated benefits are associated with fewer hours among employed parents, but the relationship is also evident before adoption and may partly reflect how benefits depend on earnings. Overall, the estimates provide little indication that state CTC adoption has substantially reduced parental employment, although meaningful effects in either direction cannot be ruled out under moderate departures from parallel trends.

Suggested Citation

  • White, Justin & Xu, Ziyue & Hamad, Rita & Parolin, Zachary, 2026. "State Child Tax Credits and Parental Labor Supply: Evidence from Staggered Adoption," INET Oxford Working Papers 2026-28, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
  • Handle: RePEc:amz:wpaper:2026-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://oms-inet.files.svdcdn.com/production/files/State_Child_Tax_Credits_And_Parental_Labor_Supply_Evidence_From_Staggered_Adoption_WP_Oct_26.pdf?dm=1791991946
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:amz:wpaper:2026-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: INET Oxford admin team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inoxfuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.