IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Asymmetries and Interaction cycles in Financial Markets

Listed author(s):
  • Roberto Leombruni

    (University of Ancona)

  • Domenico delli Gatti
  • Mauro Gallegati

This paper investigates the dynamics in a stock market where investors have heterogeneous beliefs about future prices of a risky asset, due both to information asymmetries on the "fundamentals", and to an investor specific vector of parameters that defines the strategy adopted to generate a forecast. This latter, is a weighted average of the investor private forecast made according on its beliefs about the fundamentals, and an interaction term accounting for a conformist behaviour in the investor trade activity. In the literature, the pure rational expectations hypothesis (REH) has mainly been relaxed introducing some "noise traders" in the market, to test whether the Friedman's hypothesis that they would be ruled out by the "smart ones" holds, and whether their explicit consideration could outperformance traditional modelling in describing real stock market dynamics (De Long et al. [1990], Brock-Hommes [1997ab, 1998], Goldbaum [2000]). Many studies have been conducted also with an agent based computational approach (ACE), considering again different prediction strategies - a fundamentalist one and some "chartists-like" ones - or letting the agents follow simpler adaptive rules (Arthur et al [1998], Terna [2000]). In all these studies the switch between different forecasting strategies, or the trigger to the correction of the adaptive behaviour, is governed by some fitness function defined at the individual level. Kirman-Teissière (2000) too consider a market populated by chartists and fundamentalists, but let the proportion of the two groups be determined by the interaction between individuals, where the adoption of one of the two strategies is driven by an epidiemiologic process of diffusion derived from Föllmer. In our work, we relax the distinction between chartists and fundamentalists, and put the focus on the role of interaction among individuals. Every investor follows its beliefs about the fundamentals, but adapt them and takes its buy or sell decisions taking into account the behaviour of the other investors. The strength of the interaction is endogenous: when the price is far from the individual expectations, the investor is less confident in the mood present in the market, and gives a smaller weight to the interaction term of its forecast. In equilibrium, on the opposite, the coherence between individual and market behaviour reinforce the credit the investor puts in the market signals. The non-linear dynamics emerging in the simulation of the model - implemented using the Santa Fe Institute's Swarm Simulation Toolkit - can then be attributed more than to different forecasting strategies adopted by the investors at different point of time, to an endogenous cycle in the interaction among individuals: the lower (higher) are the departures from an average belief about the fundamentals, the higher (lower) will be the confidence with which the market signals will be read. And in the periods of high confidence (interaction), the market will be more sensible to any "noisy" signal that can get it out of the equilibrium.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Universiteit van Amsterdam, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics and Finance in its series CeNDEF Workshop Papers, January 2001 with number 3B.4.

in new window

Date of creation: 04 Jan 2001
Handle: RePEc:ams:cdws01:3b.4
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Dept. of Economics and Econometrics, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, NL - 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Phone: + 31 20 525 52 58
Fax: + 31 20 525 52 83
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ams:cdws01:3b.4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.