IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/alj/wpaper/06-2021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Menstrual Hygiene Management in Poor Adolescent Girls: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Case Study in The Slums of Chennai and Delhi

Author

Listed:
  • Shruthi Ramesh

    (University of Chicago, Chicago)

  • Sumirtha Gandhi

    (BASE University, Bengaluru)

  • Varsha Reddy

    (Shri Ram College of Commerce, Delhi)

Abstract

Many women, especially in Low and Middle Income Countries face significant barriers to managing their menstrual cycles safely and easily. Only 12 percent of India’s menstruating women use sanitary napkins while the others resort to unsafe alternatives. This can drastically affect their reproductive health and educational status. Inadequate knowledge and access along with stigma and sensitivity surrounding menstruation in India impede women from actively reaching out to improve their menstrual practices. In this paper we seek to identify the cultural, psychological and economic barriers faced by poor adolescent women to practicing good menstrual hygiene. We undertook a comparative analysis of the factors affecting Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) in the slums of Delhi and Chennai. A total of 142 and 163 girls from Chennai and Delhi respectively, belonging to the age group of 11-20 were interviewed through a self-administered questionnaire. Additionally, Focussed Group Discussions were conducted amongst girls and their mothers. Main empirical analysis was conducted using a regression model. To construct indices for knowledge, cultural restrictions and empowerment related information, we adopted principal component analysis. Our findings revealed that knowledge (coef: 1.186), cultural restrictions (coef: 0.940) and empowerment (coef: 1.033) indices exerted positive and significant impacts on MHM. Socio-economic indicators, like religion, mother’s education, access to toilets and family size exerted significant influence on MHM. Qualitative findings supported these claims, information discerned via FGDs elucidated that cultural and social beliefs pertaining to menstruation varied greatly amongst the residents of Delhi and Chennai. Hence, policies undertaken for metropolitan cities in general may not work in all settings. Policy initiatives must be made to eradicate the challenges pertaining to obtaining absorbent materials, subsidies on sanitary napkins must be provided, and efficient information channels need to be established for their effective delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Shruthi Ramesh & Sumirtha Gandhi & Varsha Reddy, 2021. "Menstrual Hygiene Management in Poor Adolescent Girls: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Case Study in The Slums of Chennai and Delhi," BASE University Working Papers 06/2021, BASE University, Bengaluru, India.
  • Handle: RePEc:alj:wpaper:06/2021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://base.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/BASE-University-Wp-Series-06-2021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Menstrual Hygiene Management; Barriers; cultural restrictions; financial restrictions Classification- I12; I14; O12;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alj:wpaper:06/2021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Indrani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/basebin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.