IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajf/louvlr/2026004.html

Topics That Matter: ESG Reports and Information Asymmetry

Author

Listed:
  • Thewissen, James

    (Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/LFIN, Belgium)

  • Shrestha, Prabal

    (Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/LFIN, Belgium)

  • Arslan-Ayaydin, Özgür
  • Beibei, Yan

Abstract

This study examines how the thematic content of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reports relates to information asymmetry in capital markets. Analyzing 7,565 ESG reports from 1,715 U.S. firms between 1998 and 2023 using sentence-level topic modeling (sentLDA), we identify 30 distinct disclosure topics. Using the dispersion in analysts’ forecasts as a proxy for information asymmetry, the results indicate that environmental themes are associated with lower levels of analyst disagreement, social topics with higher disagreement, while governance-related themes show limited association. These findings highlight that the informativeness of ESG reports depends not only on whether firms choose to disclose ESG information, but also on what they choose to disclose. In addition, we find that first-time reports are more informative than subsequent ones and that topic diversity exhibits a concave relationship with informativeness, suggesting diminishing returns from a broader thematic coverage. Finally, we find that ESG reports’ informativeness is greater when analyst coverage is greater, institutional ownership is lower, ESG performance is higher, and third-party ESG ratings show greater convergence.

Suggested Citation

  • Thewissen, James & Shrestha, Prabal & Arslan-Ayaydin, Özgür & Beibei, Yan, 2026. "Topics That Matter: ESG Reports and Information Asymmetry," LIDAM Reprints LFIN 2026004, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    • Handle: RePEc:ajf:louvlr:2026004
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.70053
    Note: In: Journal of Financial Research, 2026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajf:louvlr:2026004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alain Gillis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lfuclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.