IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aiz/louvar/2026017.html

The Three-step method in a dynamic setting

Author

Listed:
  • Belhouari, Oussama

    (Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/ISBA, Belgium)

  • Devolder, Pierre

    (Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/ISBA, Belgium)

  • Linders, Daniel

Abstract

A crucial issue in a dynamic framework is how risk valuations at different times are interrelated. In this regard, the notion of time consistency was widely introduced and discussed in the literature. A time-consistent dynamic valuation states that a future payoff preferred to another payoff at some future time point should already be preferred to this payoff today. This paper aims to construct a time-consistent, dynamic version of the Three-step method introduced in Deelstra et al. ((2020). ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 50(3), 709–742.) for hybrid life Pure Endowment products, employing a backward iteration scheme. The backward scheme is illustrated in a dual-iteration approach using a Pure Endowment product without profit sharing. Furthermore, we explore the continuous-time limit of the backward scheme, incorporating profit-sharing into the Pure Endowment to investigate a hybrid life payoff. Our analysis demonstrates that the presence of the diversifiable component undermines the time-consistency of the dynamic three-step method. Consequently, the time-consistent price of the actuarial part shows a notable increase. To address this, and in accordance with Devolder and Lebègue ((2016). Risks, 4(4), 49.), we present a reduced time-consistent variant by decreasing the safety loads in each iterative step of the backward scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Belhouari, Oussama & Devolder, Pierre & Linders, Daniel, 2026. "The Three-step method in a dynamic setting," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2026017, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
  • Handle: RePEc:aiz:louvar:2026017
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1748499526100323
    Note: In: Annals of Actuarial Science, 2026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiz:louvar:2026017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alain Gillis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isuclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.