IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aiz/louvar/2025025.html

Copula based dependent censoring in cure models

Author

Listed:
  • Delhelle, Morine

    (Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/ISBA, Belgium)

  • Van Keilegom, Ingrid

    (Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/ISBA, Belgium)

Abstract

In this paper we consider a time-to-event variable T that is subject to random right censoring, and we assume that the censoring time C is stochastically dependent on T and that there is a positive probability of not observing the event. There are various situations in practice in which this happens, and appropriate models and methods need to be considered to avoid biased estimators of the survival function or incorrect conclusions in clinical trials. In this work we propose a fully parametric mixture cure model for the bivariate distribution of (T, C), which deals with all these features. The model depends on a parametric copula and on parametric marginal distributions for T and C. A major advantage of our approach in comparison to existing approaches in the literature is that the copula which models the dependence between T and C is not assumed to be known, nor is the association parameter. Furthermore, our model allows for the identification and estimation of the cure fraction and the association between T and C, despite the fact that only the smallest of these variables is observable. Sufficient conditions are developed under which the model is identified, and an estimation procedure is proposed. The asymptotic behaviour of the estimated parameters is studied, and their finite sample performance is illustrated by means of a thorough simulation study and an analysis of breast cancer data.

Suggested Citation

  • Delhelle, Morine & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2026. "Copula based dependent censoring in cure models," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2025025, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
  • Handle: RePEc:aiz:louvar:2025025
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-024-00961-7
    Note: In: Test, 2025, vol. 34(2), p. 361-382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiz:louvar:2025025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nadja Peiffer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isuclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.