IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aim/wpaimx/1741.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Biodiversity, Shapely Value and Phylogenetic Trees: Some Remarks

Author

Abstract

This paper explores the main differences between the Shapley Values of a set of taxa introduced by Haake et al. [4] and Fuchs and Jin [3], the latter having been found identical to the Fair Proportion Index (Redding and Mooers [10]). In line with Shapley [13], we identify the cooperative game basis for each of these two classes of phylogenetic games and use them (i) to construct simple formulas for these two Shapley values and (ii) to compare these different approaches. Using the set of weights of a phylogenetic tree as a parameter space, we then discuss the conditions under which these two values coincide and, if they are not the same, revisit Hartman's [5] convergence result. Finally, we compare the species ranking induced by these two values. Considering the Kendal and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, simulations show that these rankings are strongly correlated.

Suggested Citation

  • Hubert Stahn, 2017. "Biodiversity, Shapely Value and Phylogenetic Trees: Some Remarks," AMSE Working Papers 1741, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    • Handle: RePEc:aim:wpaimx:1741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.amse-aixmarseille.fr/sites/default/files/_dt/2012/wp_2017_-_nr_41.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kleinberg, Norman L. & Weiss, Jeffrey H., 1985. "A new formula for the Shapley value," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 311-315.
    2. Haake, Claus-Jochen & Kashiwada, Akemi & Su, Francis Edward, 2016. "The Shapley Value of Phylogenetic Trees," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 363, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2021. "Mathematical indices for the influence of risk factors on the lethality of a disease," ThE Papers 21/02, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Welter, Dominik & Napel, Stefan, 2016. "Responsibility-based allocation of cartel damages," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145886, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Claus-Jochen Haake, 2008. "Comments on: Transversality of the Shapley value," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 48-50, July.
    3. Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2021. "Mathematical indices for the influence of risk factors on the lethality of a disease," ThE Papers 21/02, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    4. Norman Kleinberg & Jeffrey Weiss, 2013. "On membership and marginal values," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(2), pages 357-373, May.
    5. de Moura, Gustavo Nikolaus Pinto & Legey, Luiz Fernando Loureiro & Howells, Mark, 2018. "A Brazilian perspective of power systems integration using OSeMOSYS SAMBA – South America Model Base – and the bargaining power of neighbouring countries: A cooperative games approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 470-485.
    6. Klaus Kultti & Hannu Salonen, 2007. "Minimum norm solutions for cooperative games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 35(4), pages 591-602, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    biodiversity; phylogenetic trees; Shapley value; Fair Proportion index;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aim:wpaimx:1741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gregory Cornu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amseafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.