IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uwauwp/126036.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The quality of resource condition targets in regional natural resource management in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Geoff
  • Roberts, Anna M.
  • Alexander, Jennifer
  • McNamara, Les
  • Pannell, David J.

Abstract

Natural resource management organisations in Australia routinely establish resource condition targets in their regional plans/catchment strategies. We reviewed biodiversity, water and community resource condition targets set by Catchment Management Authorities (CMAs) in Victoria and New South Wales (NSW) over planning cycles since 1997 against criteria of being specific, measurable, and time-bound (SMT). The overall quality of targets is poor with less than 30% of targets meeting the three criteria. Disturbingly there are no SMT targets in the most recent NSW CMA catchment strategies. We identify three major reasons for poor target setting: a lack of appropriate standards and guidelines from governments to enable high quality target setting; a lack of realism about the budgetary and technical feasibility of ambitious environmental targets amongst those involved in natural resource management; and a lack of adequate focus on outcomes by both CMAs and governments. Improvements to target setting can be achieved through stronger signals and commitment by governments, including by rewarding performance of regional bodies practicing outcome-focused accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Geoff & Roberts, Anna M. & Alexander, Jennifer & McNamara, Les & Pannell, David J., 2012. "The quality of resource condition targets in regional natural resource management in Australia," Working Papers 126036, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uwauwp:126036
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.126036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/126036/files/WP120009%20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.126036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uwauwp:126036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aruwaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.