IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uwarer/268609.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technological Leadership And Productivity Leadership In Manufacturing Since The Industrial Revolution: Implications For The Convergence Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Broadberry, Steve

Abstract

The United States has been the labor productivity leader in manufacturing since the early nineteenth century despite changes in technological leadership from Britain to the United States and then to Germany and Japan. U.S. productivity leadership is based on the more widespread use of mass production rather than craft production methods, determined by resource and factor endowments and demand patterns. The two systems can coexist so long as the technologically lagging system imitates and adapts. Changes in the relative dynamism of the two systems explain changes in technological leadership but without necessarily leading to changes in productivity leadership. Copyright 1994 by Royal Economic Society.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Broadberry, Steve, 1993. "Technological Leadership And Productivity Leadership In Manufacturing Since The Industrial Revolution: Implications For The Convergence Debate," Economic Research Papers 268609, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uwarer:268609
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.268609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/268609/files/twerp414.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/268609/files/twerp414.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.268609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uwarer:268609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/workingpapers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.