IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uwapdp/230947.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Policies for Pest Control: Toward an Analytical Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Hertzler, G.L
  • Lindner, R.K.
  • Pandey, S.

Abstract

In dryland wheat farming in Western Australia, the way in which a particular paddock responds to fertilizer application can vary markedly from year to year. Uncertainty about grain yield arises because inputs which can be controlled by the farmer, such as the rate of applied nitrogen, interact with exogenous factors such as climate, soil physical and chemical factors, and diseases, weeds and pests. Thus, fertilizer decisions have to be based on farmers' subjective beliefs about yields and its determinants. Farmers may have access to information which reduces production uncertainty before the time of fertilization decision. For instance, soil tests which measure soil nutrient levels have been available to farmers in Western Australia for several years. While they have been widely adopted in determining rates of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers, their usefulness in making nitrogen fertilizer recommendations is unclear. Recently, it has been claimed by CSBP that nitrogen applied in accordance with soil test results and the CSBP soil testing model was highly profitable, even in ares experiencing poor seasonal conditions (Wesfarmers Ltd Annual Report 1985). The aim of this paper is firstly to analyse existing opportunities for farmers to make decisions on fertilizer application rates contingent on available information about soil nutrients and seasonal conditions; and secondly to evaluate the potential value of further research on soil chemistry and plant nutrition to improve fertilizer decision making. To estimate the value of the information on soil nutrient status, it is necessary to compare the value of the optimal strategies, given utilization of the information with value of the optimal strategies if it is ignored. An appropriate framework for this is Bayesian decision theory (Anderson, Dillion and Hardaker 1985). This theory takes account of the precision of the information that is available, and is a useful basis for comparing costs and benefits of different sources of information, such as soil test data vis-a-vis paddock histories.

Suggested Citation

  • Hertzler, G.L & Lindner, R.K. & Pandey, S., 1989. "Public Policies for Pest Control: Toward an Analytical Framework," Discussion Papers 230947, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uwapdp:230947
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.230947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230947/files/UWA%208%201989.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.230947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uwapdp:230947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aruwaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.