IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/utaeer/303636.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Timed A.I. and Natural Service in Beef Cattle

Author

Listed:
  • Griffith, Andrew P.
  • Boyer, Christopher N.
  • Rhinehart, Justin D.
  • Carter, Courtney

Abstract

Cattle breeders have long used natural service (NS) breeding (i.e., live bulls breeding cows as they naturally show heat), and it remains the predominant practice for most cow-calf producers. However, many cattle breeders have embraced the use of reproductive technologies such as artificial insemination (AI), estrus synchronization (ES) and embryo transfer (ET). The use of AI — more specifically timed AI (TAI; synchronized estrus to inseminate all cows in a group at the same time) — has garnered increased attention from seedstock and commercial producers over the past decade. There are several reasons producers have adopted AI including: • Access to genetics from sires that are cost prohibitive if purchasing a bull for natural service. • Selecting genetics from multiple bulls to complement individual cows in the same mating group. • Owning and managing fewer bulls. • Narrowing the time frame of calving for the herd. TAI has been widely adopted in beef production because it offers the benefits of AI, while reducing and concentrating the quantity of labor related to estrous detection (“checking heat”). Moreover, the modern ES protocols for TAI can shorten the calving season while increasing overall calving rate. Even with these positive attributes, and numerous other benefits, many producers still view TAI as cost prohibitive. Thus, it is imperative to compare the costs and benefits for both TAI and NS to determine which breeding program is the most ideal for a given scenario. Given the production benefits from TAI mentioned above, a clear indication of whether the production benefits exceed additional costs should be reached before deciding to implement this breeding technology in an operation. The objective of this paper is to compare the costs and revenues resulting from TAI against the costs and revenues resulting from NS breeding systems. These attributes will be compared across different size operations and across the typical range of pregnancy rates expected from application of a single TAI to begin the breeding season.

Suggested Citation

  • Griffith, Andrew P. & Boyer, Christopher N. & Rhinehart, Justin D. & Carter, Courtney, 2020. "Cost-Benefit Analysis of Timed A.I. and Natural Service in Beef Cattle," Extension Reports 303636, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:303636
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.303636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/303636/files/W899.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.303636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management; Financial Economics; Livestock Production/Industries;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:303636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.