IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/utaeer/302910.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why a Trade Agreement With Japan Is Needed for U.S. Beef Exports

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad, Andrew
  • Griffith, Andrew P.

Abstract

The signing of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans- Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) in March 2018 could disadvantage U.S. beef in Japan. Beef-exporting countries party to the agreement (e.g., Australia, New Zealand, Mexico and Canada) will see an immediate reduction and phase- down of tariffs from their current levels of 38.5 percent (muscle cuts) and 50 percent (select offal products) to 9 percent over a 15-year period. For some offal products, tariffs will be phased out completely (New Zealand Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2018). On the other hand, U.S. beef will continue to face tariffs of 38.5 percent to 50 percent, as well as a global safeguard tariff of 50 percent when imports exceed a specified level (Muhammad et al., 2016). Although Australia and Mexico have existing agreements with Japan, the proposed CPTPP tariff reductions are beyond those negotiated in prior agreements. The U.S. has free trade agreements with several CPTPP countries, but a major exception is Japan, which is the leading market for U.S. beef exports. In 2017, U.S. beef exports totaled $7.3 billion; Japan accounted for more than 25 percent of this total ($1.9 billion) (USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service, 2018). Understandably, the tariff advantage for a major competitor like Australia and smaller competitors like Canada, New Zealand and Mexico has raised concerns in the U.S. beef industry about its future in Japan. Japanese beef imports are largely split between the U.S. and Australia. While beef imports from other CPTPP countries are smaller by comparison, the proposed tariff reductions could make these countries more important players. For instance, the Government of Canada (2018) projects that Canadian beef exports to Japan will increase by 95 percent with full implementation of the CPTPP. The overall goal of this report is to examine how CPTPP tariff reductions in Japan could impact the competitiveness of U.S. beef, vis-à-vis Australian beef and beef from other CPTPP countries. While there is some evidence that Japanese consumers see U.S. and Australian beef as somewhat different (e.g., grain-fed versus grass-fed), prior research suggests that price competition is still important and that tariffs could affect the competitiveness of exporting countries (Muhammad et al., 2018). Based on recently published research on Japanese beef imports, we present findings of how tariff reductions for Australia and other CPTPP countries could impact U.S. beef in Japan. The recovery of U.S. beef in Japan since the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) ban was lifted in 2006 has been notable. However, these gains and the current status of U.S. beef in Japan could be in jeopardy if the U.S. does not obtain market access on par with CPTPP countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad, Andrew & Griffith, Andrew P., 2018. "Why a Trade Agreement With Japan Is Needed for U.S. Beef Exports," Extension Reports 302910, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:302910
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.302910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/302910/files/W656.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.302910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; International Relations/Trade;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:302910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.