IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/unasrr/322806.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of Phase 1 Screening for the 1996 Agricultural Resource Management Study

Author

Listed:
  • Apodaca, Mark
  • Stanley, Jaki

Abstract

The Agricultural Resource Management Study (ARMS) identifies production practices farm operators use to produce certain commodities, determines the costs to produce those commodities, and describes the economic health of a cross-section of ALL farm and ranch operations. The ARMS design integrated and replaced the Cropping Practices Survey (CPS) and the Farm Costs and Returns Survey (FCRS). The sampling design consists of three phases; a screening phase conducted in early summer, the production practice phase conducted in late summer to early fall and the economic costs and returns phase conducted in late winter and spring. The objective of the screening phase (PI) is to improve the quality of estimates by increasing the number of usable reports (versus sampling from list frame control data only) without increasing the number of field contacts. The screening phase identifies in-business sample units and operations having targeted commodities. State Statistical Offices during PI had the option of contacting operations via a telephone interview or using other sources of information to gather commodity specific information about the sampled operation. The presence or absence of a commodity determined whether the operation was eligible to be selected for a Phase 2 (P2) or Phase 3 (P3) interview. This report examines the effectiveness of PI screening and the efficiency of other screening sources relative to the number of usable reports in P2 and P3.

Suggested Citation

  • Apodaca, Mark & Stanley, Jaki, 1998. "Evaluation of Phase 1 Screening for the 1996 Agricultural Resource Management Study," NASS Research Reports 322806, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:unasrr:322806
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.322806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/322806/files/RD-98-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.322806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Day, Charles & Apodaca, Mark & McCarthy, Jaki Stanley, 1999. "Analyzing Questionnaire Editing to Improve Data Quality: Results from the 1996 Agricultural Resource Management Study," NASS Research Reports 322794, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unasrr:322806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nass.usda.gov/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.