IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/unasrr/235087.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Using Respondent Prediction Models to Improve Efficiency of Incentive Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Earp, Morgan S.
  • McCarthy, Jaki S.

Abstract

In an effort to increase response rates, the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) began experimenting with monetary incentives in 2004. Follow-up assessments of the monetary incentive in 2005 demonstrated that ATM cash cards are beneficial in increasing Agricultural Resource Management Survey Phase III (ARMS III) response rates and decreasing survey costs; however, it is unknown which sampled units would have responded without the incentive. This paper discusses the use of data mining to identify likely ARMS III respondents. A series of models were built using 2002 Census of Agriculture data to predict several years of ARMS III sample respondents before (2003-2004) incentives were introduced. These models were applied to the years after incentives were introduced (2005-2007) to confirm that they continued to identify likely respondents. The respondent prediction models discussed in this report enable NASS to flag persons likely to respond given no incentive. Providing incentives to these respondents requires substantial costs, but likely does not increase overall response rates. In addition, if providing them incentives does increase response rates, it may increase them in such a way that NASS estimates are further biased if only more of the same type of operations opt to respond.

Suggested Citation

  • Earp, Morgan S. & McCarthy, Jaki S., 2009. "Using Respondent Prediction Models to Improve Efficiency of Incentive Allocation," NASS Research Reports 235087, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:unasrr:235087
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.235087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235087/files/using%20respondent%20prediction%20models%20to%20improve%20efficiency%20of%20incentive%20allocation.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.235087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McCarthy Jaki & Wagner James & Sanders Herschel Lisette, 2017. "The Impact of Targeted Data Collection on Nonresponse Bias in an Establishment Survey: A Simulation Study of Adaptive Survey Design," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(3), pages 857-871, September.
    2. Mitchell, Melissa & Ott, Kathy & McCarthy, Jaki, 2015. "Targeted Data Collection Efforts for the 2012 ARMS III," NASS Research Reports 234303, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    3. McCarthy, Jaki S. & Jacob, Thomas & McCraken, Amanda, 2010. "Modeling Non-response in National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) Surveys Using Classification Trees," NASS Research Reports 235029, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    4. repec:ags:unassr:235029 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:ags:unassr:234303 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unasrr:235087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nass.usda.gov/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.