IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/unasrr/235075.html

Using Multi-Phase Sampling to Limit Respondent Burden Across Agriculture Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Kott, Phillip S.
  • Fetter, Matthew J.

Abstract

The National Agricultural Statistics Service is developing strategies that limit the amount of sample overlap across unrelated surveys by using multi-phase sampling principles. In its simplest form, Sample A is selected first, and then Sample B is chosen from among those members of the population not selected for Sample A. Effectively, Sample B is selected in two-phases. This two-phase approach extends easily to the coordination of more than two samples, although meeting accuracy and/or sample-size targets while maintaining strict sample exclusivity is not always possible. Variation of the basic approach address this problem, but lead to some theoretical difficulties. Sampling weights may be based on products of conditional selection probabilities rather than on unconditional selection probabilities. Randomization-based variance estimation likewise may depend on the product of conditional joint selection probabilities. In practice, variance estimates will be reasonable but may not always be randomization consistent.

Suggested Citation

  • Kott, Phillip S. & Fetter, Matthew J., 1999. "Using Multi-Phase Sampling to Limit Respondent Burden Across Agriculture Surveys," NASS Research Reports 235075, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:unasrr:235075
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.235075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235075/files/SEQPROBsgnsp2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.235075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perry, Charles R. & Burt, Jameson C., 1994. "Redrawing the 1993 Farm Costs and Returns Survey List Frame Sample to Reduce its Overlap with the 1992 FCRS and Three Other Major 1993 Surveys," NASS Research Reports 235056, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    2. List, John A, et al, 2001. "Academic Economists Behaving Badly? A Survey on Three Areas of Unethical Behavior," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(1), pages 162-170, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kott, Phillip S. & Bailey, Jeffrey T., 2000. "The Theory and Practice of Maximal Brewer Selection with Poisson PRN Sampling," NASS Research Reports 234380, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    2. repec:ags:unassr:234380 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ags:unassr:235075 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Gary Charness & David Masclet & Marie Claire Villeval, 2014. "The Dark Side of Competition for Status," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 38-55, January.
    3. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    4. Gharad Bryan & Jonathan de Quidt & Tom Wilkening & Nitin Yadav, 2017. "Land Trade and Development: A Market Design Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 6557, CESifo.
    5. Miloš Fišar & Ben Greiner & Christoph Huber & Elena Katok & Ali I. Ozkes, 2024. "Reproducibility in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1343-1356, March.
    6. Gary Hoover, 2006. "A Game-Theoretic Model of Plagiarism," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 34(4), pages 449-454, December.
    7. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John List, 2016. "Field Experiments in Markets," Artefactual Field Experiments j0002, The Field Experiments Website.
    8. de Mesnard, Louis, 2017. "Attributing credit to coauthors in academic publishing: The 1/n rule, parallelization, and team bonuses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 778-788.
    9. Abdullah A. Alasmary, 2019. "Multiword Sequences and Language Learning Pedagogy: Bridging the Research-Practice Gap," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 204-204, January.
    10. Deborah Dawson & Jason F. Shogren, 2001. "An Update on Priorities and Expenditures under the Endangered Species Act," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(4), pages 527-532.
    11. Denis Fougère & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2019. "Causal Inference and Impact Evaluation," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 510-511-5, pages 181-200.
    12. Le Maux, Benoît & Necker, Sarah & Rocaboy, Yvon, 2019. "Cheat or perish? A theory of scientific customs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    13. Gardner, Chastina, 1923. "Agricultural Cooperation: A Selected and Annotated Reading List, With Special Reference to Purchasing, Marketing and Credit," Miscellaneous Publications 333911, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Banerjee, Ritwik & Mitra, Arnab, 2018. "On monetary and non-monetary interventions to combat corruption," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 332-355.
    15. Brian Fabo & Martina Jancokova & Elisabeth Kempf & Lubos Pastor, 2020. "Fifty Shades of QE: Conflicts of Interest in Economic Research," Working Papers 2020-128, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    16. Gary Charness & David Masclet & Marie Claire Villeval, 2014. "The Dark Side of Competition for Status (preprint)," Working Papers halshs-01090241, HAL.
    17. Moritz A. Drupp & Menusch Khadjavi & Rudi Voss, 2024. "The Truth-Telling of Truth-Seekers: Evidence from Online Experiments with Scientists," CESifo Working Paper Series 10897, CESifo.
    18. Hendrik P. van Dalen & Arjo Klamer, 2005. "Is there such a Thing called Scientific Waste?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-005/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Gary A. Hoover, 2004. "Whose Line Is It? Plagiarism in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(2), pages 487-493, June.
    20. Necker, Sarah, 2014. "Scientific misbehavior in economics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1747-1759.
    21. Denis Fougère & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2020. "Policy Evaluation Using Causal Inference Methods," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03455978, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unasrr:235075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nass.usda.gov/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.