IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/unahmp/32751.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reference Of 1996 U.S. Regional Sheep Health And Management Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Wineland, Nora

Abstract

In 1995, the National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) collaborated with the Research and Education Division of the American Sheep Industry Association (ASI) in developing a needs assessment tool to identify the most important health and productivity factors for the sheep industry. In collaboration with the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), a statistically designed producer sample was selected to provide estimates for the United States sheep population in the 48 contiguous states. The NAHMS/ASI questionnaires were mailed to 19,807 sheep operations in January 1996; data were received and summarized from 5,174 respondents. It was estimated that in the 48 contiguous states, there were approximately 8,433,400 sheep as of January 1, 1996. The greatest percentages of sheep were found in the Mountain and West South Central regions of the United States (33.6 percent and 20.6 percent, respectively). The majority of operations in all regions were farm flocks. Culling of sheep one year of age or older was greatest in the East South Central region (38.3 percent of sheep ) and lowest in the Mountain region (12.7 percent of sheep). Old age was the reason most frequently given for culling or death in all regions except East South Central, where the reason most frequently given was economic. By region, the condition present on the greatest number of operations was stomach/intestinal worms, except in the Mountain and East South Central regions, in which the conditions present on the greatest number of operations were sheep ticks and footrot, respectively. The West North Central Region had the greatest percentage of operations adding antibiotics to feed or water (42.5 percent during the previous 3 years), while the Northeast region had the lowest (21.0 percent during the previous 3 years). Slaughter lambs were the greatest percentage of gross income by operation average in all regions except West South Central, where feeder lambs were the greatest percentage of gross income by operation average. In all regions, feed and price volatility were the categories that limited profitability for the largest numbers of operations. Contact for this paper: Nora Wineland

Suggested Citation

  • Wineland, Nora, 1996. "Reference Of 1996 U.S. Regional Sheep Health And Management Practices," Miscellaneous Publications 32751, United States Department of Agriculture, National Animal Health Monitoring System.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:unahmp:32751
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.32751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32751/files/sheep01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.32751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unahmp:32751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://nahms.aphis.usda.gov/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.