Author
Listed:
- Amissah, J. N.
- Opoku-Agyemang, F.
- Asem, F.A.
- Osei-Safo, D.
- Addae-Mensah, I.
Abstract
Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schlt. is an important multipurpose medicinal plant used for the treatment of ailments such as malaria. Despite the ongoing efforts in domesticating the herb, the ideal planting density and its benefits are unknown. A study was conducted to determine the influence of six C. sanguinolenta accessions and three planting densities (15, 30 and 45 plants/1.8 m2 ) on root biomass, cryptolepine concentration and cryptolepine yield. Also, benefit-cost ratios were determined for each plant density across the four cultivation periods (9, 12, 15 and 18 months). The cultivation of C. sanguinolenta at the highest planting density (45 plants/1.8 m2 ) increased root biomass (value), cryptolepine content (2.08 mg/100 mg dry root) and cryptolepine yield (23.31 mg mg/1.8 m2 ) compared to those cultivated at lower planting densities (15 and 30 plants/1.8 m2 ). The duration for growing C. sanguinolenta had a more significant influence on cryptolepine yield but not the cryptolepine content. Plants cultivated for 15 months gave the maximum cryptolepine yield (10.33 g/bed), indicating 15 months as the optimum time to harvest the roots. The benefit-cost analysis revealed that growing the plant at a density of 45 plants/1.8 m2 (25,920 plants/acre) for 18 months was a more profitable venture with a benefit-cost ratio of 3.45. Commercial cultivation of C. sanguinolenta at 45 plants per bed area of 1.8 m2 (25,920 plants/acre) for 15–18 months is recommended as the most profitable and promising cropping practice to ensure the sustainable supply of planting material.
Suggested Citation
Amissah, J. N. & Opoku-Agyemang, F. & Asem, F.A. & Osei-Safo, D. & Addae-Mensah, I., 2025.
"Increasing The Planting Density Of Cryptolepis Sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schlt Increased Root Biomass And Cryptolepine Yield,"
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
387591, University of Ghana.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ugaeab:387591
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.387591
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ugaeab:387591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daughgh.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.