IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/333718.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

1980 Pesticide Use on Soybeans in the Southeast

Author

Listed:
  • Hanthorn, Michael
  • Osteen, Craig
  • McDowell, Robert
  • Roberson, Larry

Abstract

Farmers reported that 18.1 million pounds active ingredient (a.i.) of pesticides were applied to soybeans in the Southeast during 1980. This consisted of 11.3 million pounds (a.i.) of herbicides, 5.1 million pounds (a.i.) of insecticides, 1.4 million pounds (a.i.) of nematicides, and 234,000 pounds (a.i.) of fungicides. Pesticide acre-treatments totaled 16.4 million and consisted of 9.7 million with herbicides, 5.8 million with insecticides, 555,000 with nematicides, and 384,000 with fungicides. The primary herbicides were alachlor, bentazon, metribuzin, and trifluralin. The major insecticides were carbaryl and methomyl. Aldicarb and ethylene dibromide were the primary nematicides and benomyl was the major fungicide. Herbicides were applied primarily to control cocklebur and crabgrass infestations, while insecticides were mainly used for armyworm and corn earworm control. Anthracnose and pod and stem blight were the major diseases. Coefficients of variation were computed for acres of soybeans treated with specific pesticide materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanthorn, Michael & Osteen, Craig & McDowell, Robert & Roberson, Larry, 1982. "1980 Pesticide Use on Soybeans in the Southeast," Staff Reports 333718, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:333718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333718/files/AGES820203.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:333718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.