Author
Listed:
- Reid, J. Norman
- Rowley, Thomas D.
Abstract
The National Commission on Agriculture and Rural Development Policy, established by Congress to provide broad, long-range policy perspectives, examined rural development policy issues and made many field visits to observe rural conditions and rural development projects. The Commission recognized the diversity of rural communities and identified causes of rural economic change to be: (1) the decline of traditional resources-based industries; (2) international competition; (3) changes in technology and the job market; and (4) the physical distance and social isolation of rural communities. The following principles are suggested to guide rural development: (1) rural areas and people must be economically self-reliant; (2) rural areas and people must be able to adapt rapidly and effectively to changing market conditions; and (3) the rural physical and cultural environment--valuable elements of national life--should be protected. To achieve these goals, the federal government should undertake to: (1) review all of its policies to determine their effects on rural areas; (2) improve the availability of information about rural conditions and development strategies; (3) adopt a comprehensive and strategic approach to rural development; (4) foster better cooperation among rural development participants; (5) incorporate flexibility in its policies to accommodate the diversity of rural America; (6) promote innovation and experimentation in the pursuit of rural development; and (7) make education a major component of rural development policies. Improved rural education is necessary to attract high-wage high-skilled industries and to foster entrepreneurship and small-business growth, but rural schools are hampered by lack of funds and higher costs per student.
Suggested Citation
Reid, J. Norman & Rowley, Thomas D., 1990.
"Future Directions in Rural Development Policy,"
Miscellaneous Publications
356054, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:uersmp:356054
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.356054
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:356054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.