IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/330279.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Federal Funds in Nonmetro Areas: Patterns and Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Reid, J. Norman
  • Whitehead, Eleanor

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: Federal funds to rural areas and small towns grew more rapidly in 1976-79 than Federal funding to metropolitan areas, but were still 10 percent less than the 1979 national average. Nonmetro Federal funding per capita reached $1,994, 87 percent of the metro level. The South received $172 billion in Federal funds, more than any other region and nearly a third of the $483 billion national total. The West received the most Federal funds on a per capita basis. This bulletin outlines the allocation of Federal dollars among regions and localities, concentrating on the recent gains in the level of Federal funding to nonmetro counties. Data are for fiscal years 1976-79, the most recent available for analysis. While recent and contemplated congressional actions will probably have major effects on Federal funding, it may take several years for those actions to be fully reflected at the local level. In the meantime, this bulletin should serve as a useful baseline against which to measure changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Reid, J. Norman & Whitehead, Eleanor, 1982. "Federal Funds in Nonmetro Areas: Patterns and Trends," Miscellaneous Publications 330279, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:330279
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330279/files/ERS-678.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:330279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.