IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/320725.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Marketing Bill for Cigarettes

Author

Listed:
  • Farnworth, Virginia M.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: U. S. consumer expenditures for cigarettes declined slightly in 1964 after moving upward steadily for many years. The $7.1 billion spent in 1964 was 2 1/3 times 1947 expenditures of $3.0 billion. This increase reflected an upward trend in both consumption and prices. Cigarette consumption increased by about one-half during the period and average retail prices by almost three-fifths. Increases in population and consumer incomes contributed to the growth in consumption. The bill for marketing cigarettes smoked in the United States totaled $3.2 billion in 1964 compared with $1.2 billion in 1947. It represented 45 percent of consumer expenditures in 1964 and 38 percent in 1947. This marketing bill is the difference between the farm value and consumer expenditures for cigarettes less excise taxes. It is composed of the manufacturing bill and the wholesaling-retailing bill. The manufacturing bill increased by a faster rate than the wholesaling-retailing bill from 1947 to 1964. By 1964, it accounted for 54 percent of the marketing bill compared with 50 percent in 1947.

Suggested Citation

  • Farnworth, Virginia M., 1965. "The Marketing Bill for Cigarettes," Miscellaneous Publications 320725, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:320725
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.320725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/320725/files/ERS-250.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.320725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:320725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.