Author
Abstract
Excerpts from the report: The rice industry, traditionally, has had to rely on an unstable world market, including developing foreign countries, to market about one-half of its crop. While the export market has been increasing in recent years, much of the rise has been due to accelerated welfare grants and Government programs. The domestic cash market--the backbone of the rice industry--has long been characterized by a relatively low, stable consumption concentrated in a few areas and influenced by certain ethnic groups. Generally, the demand for rice consumed for direct food in the domestic market is considered to be slow to react to changing conditions. Therefore, means other than price variation were known to be necessary if direct food consumption was to be increased. A study of the patterns of rice distribution in the United States and Territories was conducted covering the marketing years 1955-56 and 1956-57, as a means of acquainting the rice industry with its domestic market and the location of its various segments. Using these market data as benchmarks, the industry increased its sales efforts considerably by three approaches: (1) increased promotional activities; (2) education of consumers in low-consuming areas as to the value of rice as a staple food; and (3) the introduction of specialty rice products. This study was planned in order to measure the changes that have occurred since the last survey and to ascertain shifts in demand that may be attributed to factors other than price. It presents milled rice distribution patterns, including destination of shipments by States, type of rice, kind of buyer, and package information.
Suggested Citation
McGrath, Edward J., 1964.
"Distribution Patterns of Rice in the United States,"
Miscellaneous Publications
320478, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:uersmp:320478
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.320478
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:320478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.