IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/320367.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Desert Land Act in Mid-Twentieth Century: Issues and Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Stewart, Clyde E.

Abstract

Excerpts from the Introduction: The Desert Land Act, which became law on March 3, 1877, permits individuals to acquire title to public land for the purpose of developing irrigated farms. In passing the Act, Congress emphasized the importance of private enterprise. In many respects, the bill was more liberal than the Homestead Law. But the limited amount of public control permitted many abuses. Proof for patent was made frequently without meeting the requirements of the Act. Much land was transferred to private ownership under the Act during the first several decades after its passage, but the program in general has fallen short of Congressional expectations in this respect. Problems related to the desert land program may be divided into three main categories: (1) The basic legislation--the Desert Land Act as amended, and other pertinent legislation in terms of present needs; (2) administrative machinery and costs of administration; and (3) individual and community problems connected with development of land and water resources under the program. In this report, consideration will first be given to the basic legislation and to the administrative policies that constitute the framework within which individuals try to develop the land and water and to obtain ownership. We will next examine and appraise activity under this legislation in the last 16 years. Finally, we will review and analyze the main problems with respect to administration, water supply, water rights, and promotion and speculation. It is hoped that the report will provide basic information for use of those interested in administration of public land programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Stewart, Clyde E., 1964. "The Desert Land Act in Mid-Twentieth Century: Issues and Problems," Miscellaneous Publications 320367, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:320367
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.320367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/320367/files/ERS-151.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.320367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:320367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.