IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/312476.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Our Land and Water Resources: Current and Prospective Supplies and Uses

Author

Listed:
  • Economic Research Service

Abstract

U.S. land and water resources are analyzed as a basis for projecting national agricultural cropland and other land needs to the year 2000. Impact of changes in technology and resource development as well as environmental and institutional factors affecting the availability of these natural resources are discussed. Emphasis is placed on the continuing responsibility of Federal, State, and local governments to assess the adequacy of our natural resources to meet future needs and to improve the quality of the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Economic Research Service, 1974. "Our Land and Water Resources: Current and Prospective Supplies and Uses," Miscellaneous Publications 312476, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:312476
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.312476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/312476/files/mrr1290.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.312476?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Spinks, Thomas & Dahl, Dale C., 1981. "Inputs Used in U.S. Farm Production: A Bibliography of Selected Economic Studies, 1950-80," Economics and Statistics Services (ESS) Reports 319963, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Lynne, Gary D., 1978. "Issues And Problems In Agricultural Water Demand Estimation From Secondary Data Sources," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-6, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:312476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.