IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersfc/315970.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effect of Grades and Weights on Cottonseed Margins of Cooperative Gins

Author

Listed:
  • Bowser, William C., Jr.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: Grading cottonseed at oil mills generally results in ginners receiving more equitable prices on seed and larger margins. Gains or losses in gin purchase weights of cottonseed as compared with sale weights also directly affect the ginner's margin, as well as dollar returns to individual growers. These findings, in general, have been recognized by the ginning and crushing industry, if not by the cotton farmer. Very little information, however, has been available regarding the extent of their importance. This study was made to supply such information as well as to better determine actual gin margins on seed. The main purpose of this study was to obtain specific information regarding premiums and discounts on graded seed and gains and losses on purchase weights to determine more accurately the total margin realized by ginners on cottonseed.

Suggested Citation

  • Bowser, William C., Jr., 1959. "Effect of Grades and Weights on Cottonseed Margins of Cooperative Gins," Farmer Cooperative Research Report (FCRR) 315970, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersfc:315970
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.315970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/315970/files/FCSgr55.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.315970?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersfc:315970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.