IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/308147.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Well-Being and Household Size: Alternative Ways of Analyzing Demographic Information on Households

Author

Listed:
  • Blaylock, James R.
  • Blisard, William N.

Abstract

In this report... Researchers use income distribution to measure the economic well-being of the population. However, analyzing how much better off one household is than another is difficult because there are many factors to consider in order to present an accurate picture. One major obstacle in comparing the well-being of households of different sizes is deciding on the appropriate way to adjust household income so that all households, regardless of size, are on an equal level in the study. For example, does a four-person household require twice as much income as a two-person household to be equally as well-off? In this report, we examine some alternative ways of adjusting household income to compare welfare across different sized households and demonstrate that the demographic characteristics(such as age, race, sex) of the poorest and richest households can vary greatly with the type of adjustment method selected.

Suggested Citation

  • Blaylock, James R. & Blisard, William N., 1990. "Economic Well-Being and Household Size: Alternative Ways of Analyzing Demographic Information on Households," Agricultural Economic Reports 308147, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:308147
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.308147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/308147/files/aer640.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.308147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:308147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.