IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerscs/329205.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Feasibility and Effects of Increased Use of Crop Residues in Beef Cattle Rations: An Exploratory Study

Author

Listed:
  • Corkern, Ray
  • McElroy, Robert
  • Taylor, Harold
  • Back, W. B.

Abstract

Beef production is expected to be 11 percent below estimated U.S. consumption by the year 2000. An increase in forage production is a necessary condition for increasing domestic beef production. Crop residues can add to forage supplies and are economically feasible to use as feed where cattle and residues are in close proximity. Generally, however, concentrations of residues are in locations differing with the concentrations of cattle. Also, most crop residues produced in the U.S. are needed to maintain the productivity of the soils. It is more economically feasible to add crop residues to the maintenance rations of nonlactating cows, or steers, than to steer growing or finishing rations. In any case, however, more supplements in the rations, especially protein, are needed when crop residues are substituted in cattle rations for other roughages. A reduction in grain feeding to beef cattle with or without an increase in use of crop residue in the rations likely would be accompanied by increased consumer prices of beef and competing meats. Those impacts would lessen with increases in feeding value of the roughages used to replace grain in the rations.

Suggested Citation

  • Corkern, Ray & McElroy, Robert & Taylor, Harold & Back, W. B., 1979. "Feasibility and Effects of Increased Use of Crop Residues in Beef Cattle Rations: An Exploratory Study," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 329205, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerscs:329205
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329205/files/CropResiduesCattleRations.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.329205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerscs:329205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.