IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerscc/292016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Policy and Risk Processes of Trade-Related Biological Invasions

Author

Listed:
  • Springborn, Michael
  • Costello, Christopher
  • McAusland, Carol

Abstract

This report summarizes the methodologies, results and empirical insights of ERS-funded research on trade-related nonindigenous species (NIS) introduction risk. Costello and McAusland (2004) is the first attempt in the economics literature to establish theoretical relationships between trade, trade policy (in the form of tariffs), and NISrelated damage, accounting for the dependence of land-use decisions on tariff rates. McAusland and Costello (2004), extending the policy choice set, characterize the optimal mix of tariffs and inspections and show how the balance depends on trading partner attributes, such as the infection rate of shipments and the marginal NIS damage level. The theory of trade-driven introductions is extended in Costello et al. (2007), where novel trade and NIS discovery data sets are used to gain an empirical understanding of dynamic invasion risk. Results support the hypothesis that cumulative introductions from some regions are a concave function of cumulative trade. Overall, this collection of research on trade-related NIS introductions highlights the welfare and biological implications of both broad and differentiated policy instruments, and the challenge of empirically supporting the latter.

Suggested Citation

  • Springborn, Michael & Costello, Christopher & McAusland, Carol, 2008. "Policy and Risk Processes of Trade-Related Biological Invasions," Contractor and Cooperator Reports 292016, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerscc:292016
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.292016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/292016/files/ccr-41.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.292016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerscc:292016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.