IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerscc/292013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Household Food Security and Tradeoffs in the Food Budget of Food Stamp Program Participants: An Engel Function Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Wilde, Parke E.
  • Troy, Lisa M.
  • Rogers, Beatrice L.

Abstract

This study develops a framework for differentiating true Food Stamp Program (FSP) impacts on food security from those that arise because households with the most severe food-related hardships are more likely to participate in the program. The framework hypothesizes that food spending improvements are the likely causal link between FSP participation and enhanced food security. Since food stamp benefits diminish with income, the incremental effect of FSP participation is also expected to diminish. Using data from the Current Population Survey Food Security Supplements in a statistical framework that controls for household income, the study finds that FSP participants have consistently higher at-home food spending and lower away-from-home-spending than comparable nonparticipants. For both groups, food security rises with income, but food security remains lower for program participants. Because differences in food spending and food security do not disappear as income rises, the study concludes that observed disparities are not likely to be true program impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilde, Parke E. & Troy, Lisa M. & Rogers, Beatrice L., 2008. "Household Food Security and Tradeoffs in the Food Budget of Food Stamp Program Participants: An Engel Function Approach," Contractor and Cooperator Reports 292013, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerscc:292013
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.292013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/292013/files/ccr-38.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.292013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerscc:292013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.