IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersab/309328.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conservation Tillage: Things to Consider

Author

Listed:
  • King, Arnold D.
  • Holcomb, G. B.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report Introduction: In this bulletin are answers to various questions you may have about whether you want to join the thousands of farmers who have switched to conservation tillage. Others say they will change when they feel confident enough to borrow money for investment in conservation tillage equipment. Some conservation tillage advocates say that before you get further into debt, you might be able to test new systems before buying equipment. Conservation tillage systems reduce erosion and moisture loss by leaving crop residue on the surface until new crops are planted. Such systems mark a striking evolution in farming practices when compared with traditional, conventional tillage. The latter refers to previously favored tillage systems using implements that buried or otherwise mixed surface residue into the soil. A lot of residue is involved. The major field crops harvested in this country (from about 341 million acres) produce about 400 million tons of crop residue each year. Any of that residue left on the surface shields soil from the beating of raindrops. Residue holds soil and water and reduces sediment and chemical runoff.

Suggested Citation

  • King, Arnold D. & Holcomb, G. B., 1985. "Conservation Tillage: Things to Consider," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309328, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:309328
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309328/files/aib461.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.309328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:309328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.