IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersab/309002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sensory Methods for Measuring Differences in Food Quality: Review of Literature and Proceedings of Conference

Author

Listed:
  • Dawson, Elsie H.
  • Harris, Betsy L.

Abstract

Excerpts from the Bulletin: Food researchers must often rely on the senses of taste, smell, sight, or feel in food-quality evaluation. But so varied are laboratory methods of selecting food-judging panels, preparing food samples, setting up rating scales, and analyzing statistical findings, that the work of one group may not check that of another. The problem has become more acute with an increase in cooperative research in food quality. Because of the need for standardizing procedures in taste-testing work to make possible comparison of results from various research institutions, the Bureau of Human Nutrition and Home Economics sponsored a conference for the critical appraisal of sensory methods for measuring food quality by taste panels. The proceedings of the conference are reported in this bulletin. The discussion under each subject is followed by a committee report which cites techniques thought to be desirable, and makes recommendations as to needed research on methodology. In preparation for the conference, members of the Bureau staff made a careful review of the literature on methods of evaluating palatability. The review is included in this publication to give a more complete picture of the present status of palatability procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawson, Elsie H. & Harris, Betsy L., 1951. "Sensory Methods for Measuring Differences in Food Quality: Review of Literature and Proceedings of Conference," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309002, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:309002
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309002/files/aib34.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.309002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:309002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.