IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersab/308606.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Grading of Cottonseed

Author

Listed:
  • Whitten, Marion E.

Abstract

Excerpts from the Report: Within the last 75 years cottonseed has advanced from a waste product to a major income producer in the Cotton Belt, and the products derived from cottonseed are important in the national economy. During the 5 years 1945-1949, the farm value of cottonseed averaged over 300 million dollars annually. Therefore, it is important that methods and facilities necessary to equitable and efficient marketing be provided. A necessary requisite to sound marketing procedures of any commodity is a standard method of grading. The principal objectives of the present study were: (1) To provide basic information and data on grading, sampling, and analyzing cottonseed; (2) to ascertain the difference between the quantity and quality of products, as indicated by the official methods of grading, sampling, and analyzing cottonseed, and the quantity and quality of the actual outturn of products of cottonseed oil mills; and (3) to use these data and information in relating the official system as accurately as possible to the actual milling outturn.

Suggested Citation

  • Whitten, Marion E., 1951. "The Grading of Cottonseed," Agricultural Information Bulletins 308606, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:308606
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.308606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/308606/files/aib39.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.308606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:308606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.