IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ucdavw/121693.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Dual of the Least-Squares Method

Author

Listed:
  • Paris, Quirino

Abstract

The least-squares method was firmly established as a scientific approach by Gauss, Legendre and Laplace within the space of a decade, at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Legendre was the first author to name the approach, in 1805, as “méthode des moindres carrés,” a “least-squares method.” Gauss, however, is credited to have used it as early as 1795, when he was 18 years old. He, subsequently, adopted it in 1801 to calculate the orbit of the newly discovered planet Ceres. Gauss published his way of looking at the least-squares approach in 1809 and gave several hints that the least-squares algorithm was a minimum variance linear estimator and that it was derivable from maximum likelihood considerations. Laplace wrote a very substantial chapter about the method in his fundamental treatise on probability theory published in 1812. Surprisingly, there still remains an unexplored aspect of the least-squares method: since the traditional formulation is stated as minimizing the sum of squared deviations subject to the linear (or nonlinear) specification of a regression model, this mathematical programming problem must have a dual counterpart. This note fills this gap and shows that the least-squares estimates of unknown parameters and deviations can be obtained by maximizing the net value of sample information.

Suggested Citation

  • Paris, Quirino, 2012. "The Dual of the Least-Squares Method," Working Papers 121693, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ucdavw:121693
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.121693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/121693/files/12-001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.121693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ucdavw:121693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.