IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uarksp/303669.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

COVID-19 Impacts on Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Ahrendsen, Bruce L.
  • Yeager, Timothy J.
  • Fang, Cao

Abstract

Summary : The uncertainty of the COVID-19 crisis is exposing community banks to a severe adverse shock that is arguably greater than the 2008 financial crisis. A stress test for the 1,671 agricultural banks and 2,261 non-agricultural banks in the United States is completed to provide an estimate of the potential effect of the COVID-19 crisis on bank financial status for 2000-2024. The stress test applies chargeoff rates derived from banks’ actual chargeoff rates for 2008 through 2012, which includes the recession and recovery following the financial crisis. The chargeoff rates applied to each bank in a local market are taken from the 90th percentile chargeoff rates for all banks in the market. Non-agricultural banks are projected by the simulation to be more adversely impacted than agricultural banks. A greater share of non-agricultural banks are expected to fail and to have lower profitability than the share of agricultural banks. A key assumption of the simulation is that agricultural loan chargeoff rates are less than non-agricultural loan chargeoff rates was the case during the 2008-2012 financial crisis. For this assumption to hold, it is implicitly assumed financial support will be provided to farmers and ranchers and the support when allocated and distributed will offset the negative impact from the COVID-19 shock experienced by farmers and ranchers. Without the support, more agricultural banks would be expected to have financial difficulties and fail. Moreover, if support is not allocated to match the parts of the agricultural sector most negatively impacted by the COVID-19 crisis, regional differences in the impact on agricultural banks are likely to emerge.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahrendsen, Bruce L. & Yeager, Timothy J. & Fang, Cao, 2020. "COVID-19 Impacts on Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Banks," Staff Papers 303669, University of Arkansas, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uarksp:303669
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.303669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/303669/files/Staff%20Paper%202020%20Ahrendsen%20Yeager%20Fang.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.303669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fang, Cao & Yeager, Timothy J., 2020. "A historical loss approach to community bank stress testing," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Agricultural Finance; Financial Economics;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uarksp:303669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauarus.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.